Viral Preservation with Protein-Supplemented Nebulizing Media in Aerosols.

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 has emphasized the need for a deeper understanding of infectivity, spread, and treatment of airborne viruses. Bacteriophages (phages) serve as ideal surrogates for respiratory pathogenic viruses thanks to their high tractability and the structural similarities tailless phages bear to viral pathogens. However, the aerosolization of enveloped SARS-CoV-2 surrogate phi6 usually results in a >3-log10 reduction in viability, limiting its usefulness as a surrogate for aerosolized coronavirus in "real world" contexts, such as a sneeze or cough. Recent work has shown that saliva or artificial saliva greatly improves the stability of viruses in aerosols and microdroplets relative to standard dilution/storage buffers like suspension medium (SM) buffer. These findings led us to investigate whether we could formulate media that preserves the viability of phi6 and other phages in artificially derived aerosols. Results indicate that SM buffer supplemented with bovine serum albumin (BSA) significantly improves the recovery of airborne phi6, MS2, and 80α and outperforms commercially formulated artificial saliva. Particle sizing and acoustic particle trapping data indicate that BSA supplementation dose-dependently improves viral survivability by reducing the extent of particle evaporation. These data suggest that our viral preservation medium may facilitate a lower-cost alternative to artificial saliva for future applied aerobiology studies. IMPORTANCE We have identified common and inexpensive lab reagents that confer increased aerosol survivability on phi6 and other phages. Our results suggest that soluble protein is a key protective component in nebulizing medium. Protein supplementation likely reduces exposure of the phage to the air-water interface by reducing the extent of particle evaporation. These findings will be useful for applications in which researchers wish to improve the survivability of these (and likely other) aerosolized viruses to better approximate highly transmissible airborne viruses like SARS-CoV-2.

COVID-19 global pandemic planning: Performance and electret charge of N95 respirators after recommended decontamination methods.

Shortages of N95 respirators for use by medical personnel have driven consideration of novel conservation strategies, including decontamination for reuse and extended use. Decontamination methods listed as promising by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (vaporous hydrogen peroxide (VHP), wet heat, ultraviolet irradiation (UVI)) and several methods considered for low resource environments (bleach, isopropyl alcohol and detergent/soap) were studied for two commonly used surgical N95 respirators (3M™ 1860 and 1870+ Aura™). Although N95 filtration performance depends on the electrostatically charged electret filtration layer, the impact of decontamination on this layer is largely unexplored. As such, respirator performance following decontamination was assessed based on the fit, filtration efficiency, and pressure drop, along with the relationship between (1) surface charge of the electret layer, and (2) elastic properties of the straps. Decontamination with VHP, wet heat, UVI, and bleach did not degrade fit and filtration performance or electret charge. Isopropyl alcohol and soap significantly degraded fit, filtration performance, and electret charge. Pressure drop across the respirators was unchanged. Modest degradation of N95 strap elasticity was observed in mechanical fatigue testing, a model for repeated donnings and doffings. CDC recommended decontamination methods including VHP, wet heat, and UV light did not degrade N95 respirator fit or filtration performance in these tests. Extended use of N95 respirators may degrade strap elasticity, but a loss of face seal integrity should be apparent during user seal checks. NIOSH recommends performing user seal checks after every donning to detect loss of appropriate fit. Decontamination methods which degrade electret charge such as alcohols or detergents should not be used on N95 respirators. The loss of N95 performance due to electret degradation would not be apparent to a respirator user or evident during a negative pressure user seal check.